People v. Santiago
G.R. No. 228819
July 24, 2019
FACTS:
The RTC and CA convicted Jeffrey
Santiago y Magtuloy for the crime of Robbery with Homicide. However, it appears
that based on a letter dated June 13, 2017 from the Bureau of Corrections,
Santiago had already died on October
11, 2016, as evidenced by the Notice issued by the New Bilibid Prison Hospital
and Certificate of Death attached thereto. Notably, this means that Santiago
had already passed away during the pendency of the criminal case against him,
since the same was resolved by the Court only through the aforesaid Resolution
dated September 4, 2017, which attained finality on December 6, 2017.
ISSUE:
Whether
or not his criminal liability is extinguished.
HELD:
Yes.
Under prevailing law and jurisprudence, Santiago's death prior to his final
conviction by the Court should have resulted in the dismissal of the criminal
case against him. Article 89 (1) of the Revised Penal Code provides that
criminal liability is totally extinguished by the death of the accused, to wit:
Article 89. How criminal liability
is totally extinguished. - Criminal liability is totally extinguished: 1. By the death of the convict, as to the
personal penalties; and as to pecuniary penalties, liability therefor is extinguished
only when the death of the offender occurs before final judgment;
1. Death of the accused pending
appeal of his conviction extinguishes his criminal liability[,] as well as the
civil liability[,] based solely thereon. As opined by Justice Regalado, in this
regard, "the death of the accused prior to final judgment terminates his
criminal liability and only the civil liability directly arising from and based
solely on the offense committed, i.e., civil liability ex delicto in senso
strictiore."
2. Corollarily, the claim for civil
liability survives notwithstanding the death of accused, if the same may also
be predicated on a source of obligation other than delict. Article 1157 of the
Civil Code enumerates these other sources of obligation from which the civil
liability may arise as a result of the same act or omission: a) Law b)
Contracts c) Quasi-contracts d) x x x e) Quasi-delicts
3. Where the civil liability
survives, as explained in Number 2 above, an action for recovery therefor may
be pursued but only by way of filing a separate civil action and subject to
Section 1, Rule 111 of the 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure as amended. This
separate civil action may be enforced either against the executor/administrator
or the estate of the accused, depending on the source of obligation upon which
the same is based as explained above.
4. Finally, the private offended
party need not fear a forfeiture of his right to file this separate civil
action by prescription, in cases where during the prosecution of the criminal
action and prior to its extinction, the private offended party instituted
together therewith the civil action. In such case, the statute of limitations
on the civil liability is deemed interrupted during the pendency of the
criminal case, conformably with provisions of Article 1155 of the Civil Code,
that should thereby avoid any apprehension on a possible privation of right by
prescription.
No comments:
Post a Comment