Sabio v.
Sandiganbayan
G.R. No. 233853-54
July 10, 2019
FACTS:
That on
18 April 2007, or sometime prior or subsequent thereto, in Mandaluyong City,
Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, accused
Camilo L. Sabio, a high ranking public officer, being then the Acting Chairman
of the Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG), conspiring,
confabulating, and confederating with Ricardo M. Abcede, Tereso L. Javier,
Narciso S. Nario, and Nicasio A. Conti, then PCGG Commissioners, while in the
performance of their official functions as such, taking advantage thereof and
committing the offense in relation to office, did then and there willfully,
unlawfully and criminally give unwarranted benefit, advantage or preference to
UCPB Leasing and Finance Corporation, a sequestered company of PCGG, thru gross
inexcusable negligence, evident bad faith, or manifest partiality, by entering
into and/or cause the entering into a Lease Agreement dated 18 April 2007 with the
said leasing corporation for the lease of five (5) service vehicles through
negotiated procurement without the required public bidding under Section 10 of
Republic Act 9184 (Government Procurement Reform Act) for the total amount of
P5,393,000.00, to the damage and prejudice of the government and to the
detriment of public interest.
ISSUE:
Whether
or not the Sandiganbayan erred in convicting petitioner.
HELD:
No. he
following are the elements of Section 3(e) of R.A. No. 3019: 1.The offender is a public officer; 2. The
act was done in the discharge of the public officer's official, administrative,
or judicial functions; 3. The act was done through manifest partiality,
evidence bad faith, or gross inexcusable negligence; and 4. The public officer
caused any undue injury to any party, including the Government, or gave any
unwarranted benefits, advantage or preference. In the instant case, there
was bad faith on the part of Sabio in entering into the subject lease
agreements based on the following: (1) for not undertaking the required
procurement process; and (2) subjecting government funds to unnecessary
expenditure without pre-allocation and the necessity for the same. The lease
agreements between the PCGG and UCPB Leasing involving the eleven (11) vehicles
in the years 2007-2009 were awarded to the latter without conducting public
bidding. This is a clear violation of R.A. No. 9184. Moreover, it was shown
that there was no allotment for the lease of the subject vehicles. Petitioner
clearly disregarded the law meant to protect public funds from irregular or
unlawful utilization. In fact, petitioner admitted that the lease agreements
were not subjected to public bidding, because it is their position that the
PCGG is exempted from the procurement law and that they were merely following
the practice of their predecessors. This is totally unacceptable, considering
that the PCGG is charged with the duty, among others, to institute corruption
preventive measures. As such, they should have been the first to follow the
law. Sadly, however, they failed. Moreover, at the time of the execution of the
lease agreements, Sabio was a member of the Board of Directors of the UCPB, the
parent company of UCPB Leasing. This fact bolstered the presence of the fourth
element, that there was unwarranted benefit, advantage or preference given to
UCPB Leasing. As correctly ruled by the Sandiganbayan, Sabio's acts
unmistakably reflect "a dishonest purpose or some moral obliquity and
conscious doing of a wrong; a breach of sworn duty through some motive or
intent or ill will."
No comments:
Post a Comment